祁建平律师网

qijianping.fabao365.com

获取律师电话请拨打

15811286610

我的位置:首页 > 时事新闻 > 正文

Stevens Explains Death Penalty

2010-05-10 16:06:46 来源:


Stevens Explains Death Penalty

Stevens Explains Death Penalty Stance, Bow Ties

Posted May 6, 2010 7:05 AM CDT
By Debra Cassens Weiss

Justice John Paul Stevens is shedding light on a couple of mysteries: why he changed his views on the death penalty, and why he favors bow ties.

Stevens in the courtyard of the
Supreme Court. Photo by Janet Fries

Stevens revealed his change of heart on the death penalty in a lethal injection case two years ago when he called capital punishment “pointless and needless.” He returned to the subject in response to a question after his speech on Wednesday in Columbus, Ohio, at a conference of the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, USA Today reports.

Stevens, who is retiring at the end of the term, said the risk of wrongful death penalty decisions has increased over the years. Juries in capital cases are dominated by those who favor the death penalty, he said, a reference to a 1986 decision that allowed prosecutors to exclude jurors reluctant to vote for a death sentence, USA Today says. The brutality of murders also increases the pressures on prosecutors, he said.

DNA testing also played a role in his decision because now "we're more aware of the risk [of wrongful conviction] than we might have been before,” he said.

The USA Today story and stories by the Associated Press and the Wall Street Journal Law Blog also had these highlights:

• Stevens explained why he wears bow ties. "The truth is I can't tie a four in hand," he said, referring to the knot on the more commonly worn tie.

• Stevens said it’s wrong to grill nominees on their positions. "It's quite unfortunate to be trying to pin down judges on particular issues," he said. "What they've said in published opinions is one thing, but speculating about issues is another."

• Stevens suggested the federal system of appointed judges with life tenure is better for judicial independence than state systems in which judges are elected. He recalled his vote as a federal appeals judge to overturn a conviction upheld by an elected state supreme court. “It’s a case I’ve thought about a great deal,” he said, because it shows the contrast between life-tenured judges and elected judges.

More on Stevens:

Practical Meaning: As the Court Shifted Right, Stevens Kept His Place

Podcast: Lat, Volokh & Thai on Front-Runners & Dark Horses to Replace Stevens

Gallery of Stevens' Top Cases

Gallery: Stevens' Childhood

大家都在看
时评律师
更多>

安庆小伙高温加班12小时死事件分析

时评律师:李先奇

擅长领域:合同纠纷  劳动纠纷  债权债务  公司并购  股份转让  企业改制  刑事辩护  外商投资  常年顾问  私人律师

雷政富重庆受审:借款行为是否构成受贿?

时评律师:高文龙

擅长领域:刑事辩护

从刘志军案看职务犯罪的预防

时评律师:李先奇

擅长领域:合同纠纷  劳动纠纷  债权债务  公司并购  股份转让  企业改制  刑事辩护  外商投资  常年顾问  私人律师

阴阳购房合同效力如何认定

时评律师:李顺涛

擅长领域:医疗事故  交通事故  婚姻家庭  遗产继承  劳动纠纷  合同纠纷  罪与非罪  债权债务  房产纠纷

厦门brt爆炸案赔偿方案分析

时评律师:李先奇

擅长领域:合同纠纷  劳动纠纷  债权债务  公司并购  股份转让  企业改制  刑事辩护  外商投资  常年顾问  私人律师