祁建平律师网

qijianping.fabao365.com

获取律师电话请拨打

15811286610

我的位置:首页 > CASE > 正文

Erotic Services

2009-10-29 22:38:30 来源:Lawfind


Erotic Services

Craiglist Sure to Be Pleased by Judge's Ruling in "Erotic Services" Lawsuit

In another win for interactive service providers under the Communications Decency Act, a federal judge in Illinois has granted Craigslist's motion for a judgment on the pleadings in a suit over the website's former "erotic services" listings.

In the lawsuit, Thomas Dart, the sheriff of Cook County, Illinois, alleged that Craigslist's erotic service category facilitated prostitution and constituted a public nuisance.  Dart asked for an injunction prohibiting Craigslist from publishing erotic services listings, and sought to recover the money that his office has spent investigating prostitution occurring on the site.
The lawsuit gained national notoriety when it was filed in March.  In response to the suit, Craigslist changed the title of the erotic section to "adult services" and implemented a manual review process for the listings in the category.  Dart pressed on with the lawsuit, however, declaring that the changes did nothing to address his complaints.

Judge John Grady of the Northern District of Illinois decided that Craigslist was shielded from liability by Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, though.  Section 230 states that a provider of an interactive service can't be held accountable as a publisher of third-party material.  In other words, websites that allow third-parties to post content - such as message boards or social networks - generally can't be sued because of the content that those third-parties place on the site.  Responsibility for the content falls on the author of the content, not the website.

In this case, the judge ruled, that means that Dart could not seek an injunction or recover money from Craigslist since that would punish Craigslist as the publisher of the listings.

Sheriff Dart has suggested that
he may appeal the ruling

大家都在看
时评律师
更多>

安庆小伙高温加班12小时死事件分析

时评律师:李先奇

擅长领域:合同纠纷  劳动纠纷  债权债务  公司并购  股份转让  企业改制  刑事辩护  外商投资  常年顾问  私人律师

雷政富重庆受审:借款行为是否构成受贿?

时评律师:高文龙

擅长领域:刑事辩护

从刘志军案看职务犯罪的预防

时评律师:李先奇

擅长领域:合同纠纷  劳动纠纷  债权债务  公司并购  股份转让  企业改制  刑事辩护  外商投资  常年顾问  私人律师

阴阳购房合同效力如何认定

时评律师:李顺涛

擅长领域:医疗事故  交通事故  婚姻家庭  遗产继承  劳动纠纷  合同纠纷  罪与非罪  债权债务  房产纠纷

厦门brt爆炸案赔偿方案分析

时评律师:李先奇

擅长领域:合同纠纷  劳动纠纷  债权债务  公司并购  股份转让  企业改制  刑事辩护  外商投资  常年顾问  私人律师