祁建平律师网

qijianping.fabao365.com

获取律师电话请拨打

15811286610

我的位置:首页 > CASE > 正文

NY court revives Tiffany's fal

2010-04-05 09:55:50 来源:


NY court revives Tiffany's fal

NY court revives Tiffany's false ad claim vs. eBay

By LARRY NEUMEISTER Associated Press Writer

NEW YORK (AP) - EBay Inc. might be violating false-advertising laws if it does not warn consumers that some items billed as upscale jeweler Tiffany Co.'s products by sellers on its Web site are not authentic, a federal appeals court said Thursday.

But online auction site operator eBay won significant victories in rulings by the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that said it did not engage in trademark infringement or trademark dilution in its use of jeweler Tiffany & Co.'s trademarks. Those rulings upheld the findings of a lower court judge.

Tiffany sued eBay in 2004, saying eBay engaged in trademark infringement, trademark dilution and false advertising because most items that sellers list for sale as genuine Tiffany products on its sites were fakes.

The appeals court left in place a finding by the lower court that eBay did not violate false advertising laws but returned the case to the judge to consider that issue again.

The three-judge panel said in its written ruling that it had difficulty with the lower court's reliance in its ruling on eBay's assertions that it did not know which listings offered counterfeit Tiffany goods. The 2nd Circuit noted that eBay advertised the goods sold through its site as Tiffany merchandise.

"The law requires us to hold eBay accountable for the words that it chose insofar as they misled or confused consumers," the appellate panel wrote.

The company would not necessarily need to stop advertising goods such as Tiffany products if it knows some of them are counterfeit, the appeals court said.

"A disclaimer might suffice," it said. "But the law prohibits an advertisement that implies that all of the goods offered on a defendant's Web site are genuine when, in fact, as here, a sizable proportion of them are not."

EBay general counsel Michael R. Jacobson said in a statement that the ruling validates the company's work to squash counterfeiting. He said the company is "confident" that the advertising issue will be decided in its favor.

Meanwhile, Tiffany CEO Michael J. Kowalski said in a statement that Tiffany is "disappointed" with the decision.

Tiffany said its lawyers are reviewing the decision and may appeal it to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Shares of New York-based Tiffany fell 5 cents in after-hours trading, after finishing regular trading up 76 cents at $48.25. Shares of San Jose, Calif.-based eBay were unchanged in after-hours trading after falling 40 cents in regular trading to finish at $26.57.

---

AP Technology Writer Rachel Metz in San Francisco contributed to this report.

2010-04-02     13:11:39 GMT

大家都在看
时评律师
更多>

安庆小伙高温加班12小时死事件分析

时评律师:李先奇

擅长领域:合同纠纷  劳动纠纷  债权债务  公司并购  股份转让  企业改制  刑事辩护  外商投资  常年顾问  私人律师

雷政富重庆受审:借款行为是否构成受贿?

时评律师:高文龙

擅长领域:刑事辩护

从刘志军案看职务犯罪的预防

时评律师:李先奇

擅长领域:合同纠纷  劳动纠纷  债权债务  公司并购  股份转让  企业改制  刑事辩护  外商投资  常年顾问  私人律师

阴阳购房合同效力如何认定

时评律师:李顺涛

擅长领域:医疗事故  交通事故  婚姻家庭  遗产继承  劳动纠纷  合同纠纷  罪与非罪  债权债务  房产纠纷

厦门brt爆炸案赔偿方案分析

时评律师:李先奇

擅长领域:合同纠纷  劳动纠纷  债权债务  公司并购  股份转让  企业改制  刑事辩护  外商投资  常年顾问  私人律师